By BBC News,

Russia and Angola have opposed moves at the UN Security Council to impose sanctions on a South Sudan general and a rebel commander, diplomats say.

The US had proposed a travel ban and asset freeze on army chief Paul Malong and rebel general Johnson Olony for continuing to fuel conflict.

The Russian ambassador to the UN said sanctions might aggravate the situation, AP news agency reports.
Fighting has continued in South Sudan despite last month’s peace deal.

Both sides signed the agreement to end the 20 months of conflict under intense regional and international pressure.

The fighting between forces loyal to President Salva Kiir and his former deputy Riek Machar has forced more than 2.2 million people from their homes in the world’s youngest state, which broke away from Sudan in 2011.

At least seven ceasefires have been agreed and then shattered – and US diplomats want to maintain the pressure to ensure the most recent deal succeeds.

Russia’s UN ambassador Vitaly Churkin said he felt sanctions were not the solution after his country’s talks with the foreign ministers of South Sudan and Sudan.

“The United States, very often they just say: ‘Sanctions, sanctions, sanctions’, and in some cases it severely aggravates the situation,” AP quotes him as saying.

According to the Reuters news agency, Venezuela also requested that the sanctions proposal be put on hold.

A hold does not mean the proposal is dead, but it delays its consideration, the agency reports.
Angola wanted to give the parties more time to implement the peace deal, it said.

Fighting broke out in South Sudan in December 2013 after President Kiir accused former Vice-President Machar of plotting a coup.

Mr Machar denied the charges, but then mobilised a rebel force to fight the government.

On Tuesday, President Kiir reiterated his reservations about the deal in a televised national address as both sides accuse the other of breaching the ceasefire.

He again listed points such as the demilitarisation of the capital, Juba, and the appointment of a foreigner to monitor the agreement as “a violation of sovereignty”.

However, he did express his commitment to the agreement.
– – – –

Russia, Angola Delay UN South Sudan Sanctions

By James Butty | VOA News,

Russia and Angola moved Tuesday to delay the imposition of targeted United Nations sanctions on leading South Sudan government and rebel officials obstructing peace in South Sudan.

This came as three human rights groups — Enough Project, Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International — called on the U.N. Security Council to impose targeted sanctions on individuals responsible for crimes and human rights violations in South Sudan.

Lindsey Hutchison, a South Sudan policy analyst at Enough Project, said her organization is disappointed by the Russian and Angolan action. She said blocking targeted sanctions undermines the Security Council’s pledge to impose serious consequences on those standing in the way of peace in South Sudan.

“The impunity will only continue in South Sudan as it has for the last 21-plus months of this conflict without serious consequences for these high-level officials who are responsible for cease-fire violations and other human rights abuses,” she said.

Rights accusations

In a September 15 letter to the U.N. Security Council, the three human rights groups said the South Sudan conflict has been characterized by war crimes and other acts that may also amount to crimes against humanity.

The groups called for the imposition of a “well-monitored arms embargo” to reduce the flow and entry of weapons and military equipment into South Sudan. The groups also called for the imposition of targeted sanctions.

Hutchison said the sanctions the groups are requesting should include a travel ban and assets freeze against those responsible and who have been designated by the Security Council.

“The sanctions that we are calling for are targeted sanctions against individuals, which would involve travel ban and assets freezes of those individuals. It’s not a blanket against the entire country or against South Sudanese people themselves,” Hutchison said.

Sanctions

In July this year the Security Council imposed sanctions on six generals – three from the South Sudan military and three from the rebel side.

Hutchison said the problem with the so-called July six is that they are “ground commanders” and have no assets outside of South Sudan to seize.

“The two individuals that the Security Council is considering sanctioning — Paul Malong and ex-general Johnson Olony — are both high-level officials with assets outside the country that could very easily be seized by several international institutions and governments, including their houses or their bank accounts so it will have a huge deterrence effect,” Hutchison said.

South Sudan President Salva Kiir said Tuesday he’s still fully committed to the peace process to end his country’s civil war, even as he said he still has reservations about the recent agreement.

South Sudan has also said repeatedly that sanctions are counter-productive to the peace process.

Concrete action urged

Hutchison said every peace-loving group hopes and prays that the South Sudan government and the rebels will be truly committed to implementing the latest peace deal. But she said both sides must back up their words with concrete action.

“Right now a cease-fire violation and other reports that the international community is getting, they not proving that they are actually committed. There can’t be empty words; there needs to be consequences; there needs to be a true commitment on the part of the South Sudanese government, the opposition on all sides to actually end the fighting,” Hutchison said.

U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon Tuesday extended an invitation to South Sudan President Kiir and rebel leader Riek Machar to come to New York this month to reinforce their shaky peace.

The rebels have said their leader will come, but it is not clear whether President Kiir will make the trip to the U.N.